<![CDATA[关于k-w SST湍流模型边界条件设置的疑惑]]>各位老师师兄师姐们好，我刚刚开始学习湍流模型，使用buoyantSimpleFoam求解器求解湍流流动问题，使用了k-w SST湍流模型，但是在计算过程中总是出现计算omega边界发散问题，也查阅了很多相关资料，还是没有解决，在这里列出所设置的边界条件设置及错误，希望大家能够帮助我指出问题所在，不胜感激！
ps：我在网格划分时边界层第一层网格宽度y+设置为0.5，网格拓展率1.2，Re约为5*10^5，checkMesh没有问题!
边界条件设置：1.png 2.png
错误及上一步运行结果
3.png

]]>https://cfd-china.com/topic/2762/关于k-w-sst湍流模型边界条件设置的疑惑RSS for NodeThu, 18 Jun 2026 08:58:07 GMTWed, 10 Jul 2019 14:09:05 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 关于k-w SST湍流模型边界条件设置的疑惑 on Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:44:36 GMT]]>//k rho_*epsilon_/k_ //epsilon rho_*Cmu_*sqr(k_)/epsilon_ 为k_和epsilon_接近0，导致除法崩溃，所以使用bound（）

可以试试增大epsilon 减小k；连续性残差也偏大，可以试试fvSchemes散度项二阶换一阶。

]]>https://cfd-china.com/post/39866https://cfd-china.com/post/39866Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:44:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 关于k-w SST湍流模型边界条件设置的疑惑 on Sat, 24 Aug 2024 09:43:41 GMT]]>@Exthan 前辈您好，我最近也使用openfoam做超临界二氧化碳流动换热这块，和您出现了类似的问题，计算时连续性那块总是很差也很难收敛。想请教下对于类似的问题您目前有啥好的解决方法嘛

]]>https://cfd-china.com/post/39838https://cfd-china.com/post/39838Sat, 24 Aug 2024 09:43:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 关于k-w SST湍流模型边界条件设置的疑惑 on Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:05:52 GMT]]>@王慧博 看样子你是在计算超临界水方面的。请问这个问题您是如何解决的？我在计算圆管等热流加热算例，采用kwSST和kEpsilon模型，尝试了buoyantSimpleFoam和rhoSipleFoam都发散，下面是我用rhoSimpleFoam计算kEpsilon的错误信息，不太明白是什么导致的发散或错误。

#0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[40] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[39] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[38] #0  Foam:    :error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[37] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[36] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[35] #0  Foam::error::printS    tack(Foam::Ostream&)[34] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[33] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[32] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ost    ream&)[31] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[30] #0  [11] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[12] #0      Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[29] #0  [13] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[14] #0  Foam::error::    printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[28] #0  [15] #Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[16] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foa    m::Ostream&)[27] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[25] #0  [17] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[2    6] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[18] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[21] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[23] #0  Foam::e    rror::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[24] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[19] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)[20] #0  Foam::error::printSta    ck(Foam::Ostream&)[22] #0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&) at ??:? [36] #1  Foam::sigFpe::sigHandler(int) at ??:?
[41] #1  Foam::sigFpe::sigHandler(int) at ??:?
        #2  ? in "/lib64/libpthread.so.0"
[29] #3  Foam::multiply(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::UList<double> const&, Foam::UList<double> const&) in "/lib64/libpthread.so.0"
[28] #3  Foam::multiply(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::UList<double> const&, Foam::UList<double> const&) at ??:?
[37] #4  Foam::tmp<Foam::DimensionedField<double, Foam::volMesh> > Foam::operator*<Foam::volMesh>(Foam::tmp<Foam::DimensionedField<double, Foam::volMesh> > co    nst&, Foam::DimensionedField<double, Foam::volMesh> const&) at ??:?
[36] #4  Foam::tmp<Foam::DimensionedField<double, Foam::volMesh> > Foam::operator*<Foam::volMesh>(Foam::tmp<Foam::DimensionedField<double, Foam::volMesh> > co    nst&, Foam::DimensionedField<double, Foam::volMesh> const&) at ??:?
[35] #4  Foam::tmp<Foam::DimensionedField<double, Foam::volMesh> > Foam::operator*<Foam::volMesh>(Foam::tmp<Foam::DimensionedField<double, Foam::volMesh> > co    nst&, Foam::DimensionedField<double, Foam::volMesh> const&) at ??:?
[36] #5  Foam::RASModels::kEpsilon<Foam::EddyDiffusivity<Foam::ThermalDiffusivity<Foam::CompressibleTurbulenceModel<Foam::fluidThermo> > > >::correct() at ??:    ?
[37] #5  Foam::RASModels::kEpsilon<Foam::EddyDiffusivity<Foam::ThermalDiffusivity<Foam::CompressibleTurbulenceModel<Foam::fluidThermo> > > >::correct() at ??:    ?
 5  Foam::RASModels::kEpsilon<Foam::EddyDiffusivity<Foam::ThermalDiffusivity<Foam::CompressibleTurbulenceModel<Foam::fluidThermo> > > >::correct()Foam::RASMode    ls::kEpsilon<Foam::EddyDiffusivity<Foam::ThermalDiffusivity<Foam::CompressibleTurbulenceModel<Foam::fluidThermo> > > >::correct()[41] #5  Foam::RASModels::kEp    silon<Foam::EddyDiffusivity<Foam::ThermalDiffusivity<Foam::CompressibleTurbulenceModel<Foam::fluidThermo> > > >::correct() at ??:?
[30] #5 Foam::RASModels::kEpsilon<Foam::EddyDiffusivity<Foam::ThermalDiffusivity<Foam::CompressibleTurbulenceModel<Foam::fluidThermo> > > >::correct() at ??:    ?

这里第一个错误应该是除数错误，下面的模型错误是什么导致，如果边界有问题的话也不会影响湍流模型？以及tmp（DimensionedField）是什么错误，也是边界错误吗？求助

]]>https://cfd-china.com/post/18097https://cfd-china.com/post/18097Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:05:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 关于k-w SST湍流模型边界条件设置的疑惑 on Sat, 15 Feb 2020 17:29:38 GMT]]>请问，你是在做变物性吗？我最近算的层流也遇见发散的问题，希望能多交流

]]>https://cfd-china.com/post/17980https://cfd-china.com/post/17980Sat, 15 Feb 2020 17:29:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 关于k-w SST湍流模型边界条件设置的疑惑 on Thu, 18 Jul 2019 07:50:16 GMT]]>谢谢李老师解答疑惑，我换用了层流和kEpsilon模型，但是仍然出现计算发散的问题，使用kEpsilon模型时也出现边界值过大的问题，我怀疑可能是由于设置物性变化过于剧烈的问题。

]]>https://cfd-china.com/post/14951https://cfd-china.com/post/14951Thu, 18 Jul 2019 07:50:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 关于k-w SST湍流模型边界条件设置的疑惑 on Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:38:43 GMT]]>你的设置看起来没问题，uniform value也没有影响，你的压力看起来很大，

你用层流计算试试看会收敛么？或者kEpsilon
kOmega公认的对Omega边界条件比较敏感

]]>https://cfd-china.com/post/14863https://cfd-china.com/post/14863Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:38:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 关于k-w SST湍流模型边界条件设置的疑惑 on Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:16:15 GMT]]>实在抱歉没有认真检查排版导致图片出现问题。现将图1重新上传
【附】壁面wall设置为恒定热流，这里有个疑惑，在设定恒热流边界条件指定的value uniform值会影响这个条件吗，感觉这个又有点类似恒定温度，但是删去会报错
1.png

]]>https://cfd-china.com/post/14861https://cfd-china.com/post/14861Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:16:15 GMT