<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[VOF模型+Lee模型是不是没办法模拟出两相区的温度恒定以及干涸点的温度突变？]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1716024242077-5eed8fd4-9397-41d2-b885-8959ce6871cf-image.png" alt="5eed8fd4-9397-41d2-b885-8959ce6871cf-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /> 图1<br />
各位前辈，我将fluent官方案例的设置（欧拉临界热流沸腾模型）改成VOF+Lee模型后就模拟不出上图的温度趋势了。<img src="/assets/uploads/files/1716024379331-f0dd19fc-adb7-42f2-9245-496794390d68-image.png" alt="f0dd19fc-adb7-42f2-9245-496794390d68-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /> 图2<br />
是我设置的不对还是VOF+Lee模型本身就模拟不出图1的这种效果呢？</p>
]]></description><link>https://cfd-china.com/topic/7107/vof模型-lee模型是不是没办法模拟出两相区的温度恒定以及干涸点的温度突变</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 12:59:24 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cfd-china.com/topic/7107.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2024 10:25:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to VOF模型+Lee模型是不是没办法模拟出两相区的温度恒定以及干涸点的温度突变？ on Mon, 02 Dec 2024 09:00:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">感觉 VOF＋LEE是不是没有考虑核态沸腾  所以不会有达到饱和温度之后温度下降那一块，而正是这一块才导致沸腾换热系数上升</p>
]]></description><link>https://cfd-china.com/post/41677</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://cfd-china.com/post/41677</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bidax1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 09:00:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>