Skip to content
  • 0 赞同
    3 帖子
    6k 浏览
    A

    您好,请问这里的Re_thetac如果不修改,即为none时,Re_thetac的默认值是多少?

  • CFD青年成长支持计划(2021)

    公告
    137
    0 赞同
    137 帖子
    165k 浏览
    F

    想问一下李老师这个计划还有吗!!很想要这本湍流模型:mianmo:

  • OpenFoam分区域计算

    OpenFOAM
    4
    0 赞同
    4 帖子
    6k 浏览
    孟豪龙

    @CarmeloSun 还没有

  • fluent报错,浮点

    Fluent
    3
    0 赞同
    3 帖子
    5k 浏览
    C

    大佬,我也是要做物体高速入水的,您这个问题解决了么,能不能加q讨论,q:2381634233

  • transition SST k-w模型中Re_thetac取值问题

    Fluent
    1
    0 赞同
    1 帖子
    2k 浏览
    A

    386b6db0-5254-4f1c-917a-606c2fa41539-image.png
    377452dc-2a13-489e-b437-19f5411e4443-image.png
    1、图中是fluent2019R1版本,湍流模型选择为transition SST k-w模型,保持默认参数,Re_thetac,Re_thetat,F_length等参数取值均为none;
    2、但是在fluent理论手册中转捩模型与SST模型耦合明确要用到Re_thetac这个参数,如果保持默认none,那么这个参数是有个默认值吗?还是有其他的处理方法。
    恳请各位前辈指点,十分感谢。

  • FLUNET 初始化失败。

    Fluent
    1
    0 赞同
    1 帖子
    2k 浏览
    2

    目前是在用重叠网格进行模拟,一个结构是固体,另一个是线弹性。用的是明渠造波,初始化总是崩溃,这是为什么呢?报错代码附在下面,感谢各位大佬抽出时间回答这个问题。
    Grouping and repartitioning the fluid cell zones...

    14 Stored Partitions:
    P Cells I-Cells Cell Ratio Faces I-Faces Face Ratio Neighbors Load
    0 52115 3581 0.069 176927 7246 0.041 5 1
    1 52472 4620 0.088 162295 4236 0.026 4 1
    2 54617 12093 0.221 134005 7412 0.055 9 1
    3 52637 6006 0.114 169686 5664 0.033 4 1
    4 52807 11023 0.209 167910 5289 0.031 6 1
    5 52057 3479 0.067 162444 4597 0.028 5 1
    6 52745 1693 0.032 170269 3362 0.020 2 1
    7 52784 13211 0.250 163205 4296 0.026 5 1
    8 52259 3566 0.068 176157 7128 0.040 5 1
    9 51910 1672 0.032 160241 2070 0.013 1 1
    10 51748 3480 0.067 164291 5004 0.030 3 1
    11 54525 9324 0.171 134306 6166 0.046 8 1
    12 51710 3562 0.069 166038 5640 0.034 4 1
    13 54297 9707 0.179 133333 6836 0.051 9 1

    Collective Partition Statistics: Minimum Maximum Total

    Cell count 51710 54617 738683
    Mean cell count deviation -2.0% 3.5%
    Partition boundary cell count 1672 13211 87017
    Partition boundary cell count ratio 3.2% 25.0% 11.8%

    Face count 133333 176927 2200909
    Mean face count deviation -16.7% 10.5%
    Partition boundary face count 2070 7412 40198
    Partition boundary face count ratio 1.3% 5.5% 1.8%

    Partition neighbor count 1 9

    Partition Method Metis
    Stored Partition Count 14

    Overset partition statistics:
    P Cells Solve-cells Dead-cells
    0 52115 58811 0
    1 52472 52274 66
    2 54617 56753 617
    3 52637 54720 391
    4 52807 46085 6296
    5 52057 52626 0
    6 52745 55832 0
    7 52784 43070 6359
    8 52259 58396 0
    9 51910 51910 0
    10 51748 53430 0
    11 54525 59651 261
    12 51710 54199 0
    13 54297 58997 228

    Overset Partition Statistics: Minimum Maximum Total

    Cell count 51710 54617 738683
    Mean cell count deviation -2.0% 3.5%

    Solve cell count 43070 59651 756754
    Mean solve cell count deviation -20.3% 10.4%

    Dead cell count 0 6359 14218
    Mean dead cell count deviation -100.0% 526.1%

    Partition Method Metis
    Stored Partition Count 14

    Done.

    10422 partition interfaces of the 215044 cells aspect ratio > 5 545456 groups for partitioning (including overlaps) Merging groups across partitions: 1 99888 2 8996 3 2718 4 599 5 112 6 20 7 2 8 0 Partition 535235 groups out of 738683 cells 183 partition interfaces of the 215044 cells aspect ratio > 5

    Grouping and repartitioning the solid cell zones...

    14 Stored Partitions:
    P Cells I-Cells Cell Ratio Faces I-Faces Face Ratio Neighbors Load
    0 3081 778 0.253 163329 1521 0.009 4 1
    1 3081 814 0.264 163934 1432 0.009 5 1
    2 3089 845 0.274 129565 7700 0.059 11 1
    3 3076 819 0.266 164712 1583 0.010 3 1
    4 3080 832 0.270 164935 1464 0.009 6 1
    5 3079 829 0.269 162882 1455 0.009 6 1
    6 3077 1026 0.333 163326 1996 0.012 7 1
    7 3089 795 0.257 165081 1535 0.009 4 1
    8 3092 928 0.300 163821 1637 0.010 5 1
    9 3093 884 0.286 160599 1611 0.010 5 1
    10 3090 761 0.246 161874 1493 0.009 4 1
    11 3075 806 0.262 127548 7289 0.057 9 1
    12 3097 868 0.280 162126 1544 0.010 5 1
    13 3098 319 0.103 126305 4986 0.039 6 1

    Collective Partition Statistics: Minimum Maximum Total

    Cell count 3075 3098 43197
    Mean cell count deviation -0.3% 0.4%
    Partition boundary cell count 319 1026 11304
    Partition boundary cell count ratio 10.3% 33.3% 26.2%

    Face count 126305 165081 2133715
    Mean face count deviation -18.9% 6.0%
    Partition boundary face count 1432 7700 46322
    Partition boundary face count ratio 0.9% 5.9% 2.2%

    Partition neighbor count 3 11

    Partition Method Metis
    Stored Partition Count 14

    Overset partition statistics:
    P Cells Solve-cells Dead-cells
    0 3081 55196 0
    1 3081 55355 66
    2 3089 54741 617
    3 3076 54989 391
    4 3080 47373 6296
    5 3079 55136 0
    6 3077 55822 0
    7 3089 46159 6359
    8 3092 55351 0
    9 3093 55003 0
    10 3090 54838 0
    11 3075 56138 261
    12 3097 54807 0
    13 3098 55846 228

    Overset Partition Statistics: Minimum Maximum Total

    Cell count 3075 3098 43197
    Mean cell count deviation -0.3% 0.4%

    Solve cell count 46159 56138 756754
    Mean solve cell count deviation -14.6% 3.9%

    Dead cell count 0 6359 14218
    Mean dead cell count deviation -100.0% 526.1%

    Partition Method Metis
    Stored Partition Count 14

    Done.

    42 partition interfaces of the 1073 cells aspect ratio > 5 43150 groups for partitioning (including overlaps) Merging groups across partitions: 1 6 2 0 Partition 43147 groups out of 43197 cells *** Subcommunicators recreated (11/14)! *** 565 partition interfaces of the 1073 cells aspect ratio > 5 Migrating partitions to compute-nodes.

    Node 1: Process 14244: Received signal SIGSEGV.

    ==============================================================================

    ==============================================================================

    Node 13: Process 4932: Received signal SIGSEGV.

    ==============================================================================

    ==============================================================================

    Node 5: Process 7224: Received signal SIGSEGV.

    ==============================================================================

    ==============================================================================

    Node 11: Process 8716: Received signal SIGSEGV.

    ==============================================================================

    ==============================================================================

    Node 7: Process 6588: Received signal SIGSEGV.

    ==============================================================================

    ==============================================================================

    Node 8: Process 5632: Received signal SIGSEGV.

    ==============================================================================

    ==============================================================================

    Node 9: Process 7040: Received signal SIGSEGV.

    ==============================================================================

    ==============================================================================

    Node 10: Process 3868: Received signal SIGSEGV.

    ==============================================================================

    ==============================================================================

    Node 6: Process 4756: Received signal SIGSEGV.

    ==============================================================================

    ==============================================================================

    Node 4: Process 820: Received signal SIGSEGV.

    ==============================================================================

    ===================================================================================
    = BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
    = RANK 0 PID 13864 RUNNING AT DESKTOP-RDMJC80
    = EXIT STATUS: -1 (ffffffff) ===================================================================================
    = BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
    = RANK 2 PID 12200 RUNNING AT DESKTOP-RDMJC80
    = EXIT STATUS: -1 (ffffffff)

    The fl process could not be started.

  • 0 赞同
    1 帖子
    1k 浏览
    M

    有没有大佬有841-B型桨的模型呀?萌新求助!27c96b65-a0ac-4c3e-a445-205b957e3f3e-image.png

  • fluent udf中体积分数宏 C_VOF 的取值问题

    Fluent
    5
    0 赞同
    5 帖子
    9k 浏览
    W

    thread_loop_c 获取subthread层的值似乎有点问题,见https://muchong.com/html/201211/5150612_2.html,最好是用mp_thread_loop_c,配合**pt和C_VOF(c, pt[0])来进行取值。

  • 0 赞同
    7 帖子
    10k 浏览
    李东岳

    如果我10月份有时间的话,或许会写个解析,更新到 http://dyfluid.com/cfd.html
    就是我这个时间比较紧

  • 0 赞同
    8 帖子
    9k 浏览
    H

    @李东岳 在 有没有utility或者force,能使颗粒在RANS模拟中像LES那样发散开来 中说:

    我们之前详细的研究过这个东西 目前DPM这面的turbulent dispersion force结果都不太好 你可以尝试一下

    想请教一下李老师,在这个stochasticDispersionRAS.C的代码中,dt代表的是什么,并没有看出它的出处在哪。。
    从结果上来看,这个dt好像不是模拟中的timestep,它的值对于每个颗都不一样。

    // Member Functions //- Update (disperse particles) virtual vector update ( const scalar dt, const label celli, const vector& U, const vector& Uc, vector& UTurb, scalar& tTurb );
  • 0 赞同
    1 帖子
    2k 浏览

    3d408cf3-836a-4aef-bb0b-a370d462f7e5-image.png 如图,左边的上部是大气边界,右边是封闭壁面。如果不在左边画和右边一样的细网格,得到的网格质量很差。如果画了细网格,则计算速度很慢。有更好的处理方式吗

  • 0 赞同
    4 帖子
    7k 浏览
    李东岳

    @ahujeffery 因为一般只有p方程需要p.flux() 目前新版本openfoam已经不需要这个了

  • 一个照片

    CFD彩虹条
    6
    0 赞同
    6 帖子
    9k 浏览
    H

    照片不错!

  • snappy多级加密生成网格时会killed

    Meshy
    5
    0 赞同
    5 帖子
    8k 浏览
    李东岳

    他这个聊天记录我没太懂。什么是拖布结构?

  • .pvtu文件ghostLevel=1

    Algorithm
    4
    0 赞同
    4 帖子
    6k 浏览
    李东岳

    感谢分享感谢分享

  • 李新亮老师的OpenCFD中湍流粘性系数

    Algorithm
    22
    0 赞同
    22 帖子
    42k 浏览
    Y

    @匡之舒云 我在做射流燃烧,可以加个联系方式聊一下:xiezuoye:

  • 柴犬表情包

    CFD彩虹条
    2
    0 赞同
    2 帖子
    4k 浏览
    李东岳

    厉害啊 我安排!

  • 如何在linux中卸载移动硬盘?

    CFD彩虹条
    14
    0 赞同
    14 帖子
    22k 浏览
    bestucanB

    @西湖冷月 对的,这里说硬盘已经是默认是移动硬盘了,移动硬盘就当个大u盘了,拔插就关机太费劲了…

  • 0 赞同
    3 帖子
    3k 浏览
    M

    有大佬知道是什么原因么

  • 0 赞同
    3 帖子
    4k 浏览
    zheZ

    @李东岳 谢谢东岳老师的回复。这个cloud的类型是在KinematicCloud.H 中对cloudType的一步细分。

    //- Type of cloud this cloud was instantiated for typedef CloudType cloudType; //- Type of parcel the cloud was instantiated for typedef typename CloudType::particleType parcelType; //- Convenience typedef for this cloud type typedef KinematicCloud<CloudType> kinematicCloudType;

    无论我保不保留这个,都显示一样的error。这个expected primary-expression before '.' token是什么意思啊?少了什么吗?