Skip to content
  • 最新
  • 版块
  • 东岳流体
  • 随机看[请狂点我]
皮肤
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • 默认(不使用皮肤)
  • 不使用皮肤
折叠
CFD中文网

CFD中文网

  1. CFD中文网
  2. OpenFOAM
  3. MPPICDyMFoam 中添加颗粒后计算一直卡住

MPPICDyMFoam 中添加颗粒后计算一直卡住

已定时 已固定 已锁定 已移动 OpenFOAM
3 帖子 2 发布者 350 浏览
  • 从旧到新
  • 从新到旧
  • 最多赞同
回复
  • 在新帖中回复
登录后回复
此主题已被删除。只有拥有主题管理权限的用户可以查看。
  • 余正东余 离线
    余正东余 离线
    余正东
    写于 最后由 编辑
    #1

    我在使用MPPICDyMFoam模拟颗粒两相流时遇到了一个问题。计算到中间某一步时,颗粒被添加到流场后,程序似乎陷入了无限循环状态,无法继续计算到下一个时间步。(版本号of2406,采用并行32核)

    具体表现为:程序成功完成了PIMPLE迭代计算(包括压力方程和速度方程的求解,残差也正常收敛),并显示了连续性误差和执行时间。随后程序进入下一个时间步(Time = 0.206549),正确创建了AMI接口,并开始求解颗粒云(Solving 3-D cloud kinematicCloud)。颗粒注入器也成功添加了29个新的颗粒包(parcels),系统中当前共有57958个颗粒包。

    在这一步后,程序就停滞不前,没有任何错误提示,也没有继续进行下一步计算。日志显示的关键参数如下:

    最大Courant数约为20
    系统中的最大颗粒体积分数为0.153386
    系统中的当前质量为0.0159749
    平均每个parcel中的实际颗粒数为227453
    我怀疑这可能与以下因素有关:

    颗粒浓度在某些区域过高导致MPPIC模型难以收敛?
    Courant数过大引起数值不稳定?
    AMI接口权重不完全匹配(日志中显示有些权重不是1)?
    颗粒-颗粒或颗粒-壁面相互作用的处理问题?
    颗粒丢失没有被捕捉到,陷入无限循环?

    我已尝试观察计算过程中的内存和CPU使用情况,没有发现明显资源耗尽的现象。请问有谁遇到过类似问题或有解决方案建议?是否需要调整特定的模型参数或时间步长控制策略?

    Courant Number mean: 0.0772217 max: 20.0091
    deltaT = 4.24916e-05
    Time = 0.206506
    
    AMI: Creating AMI for source:AMI1 and target:AMI1_slave
    AMI: Patch source faces: 240
    AMI: Patch target faces: 238
    AMI: Patch source sum(weights) min:0.978615 max:1 average:0.998005
    AMI: Patch target sum(weights) min:0.934139 max:1 average:0.992771
    AMI: Creating AMI for source:AMI2 and target:AMI2_slave
    AMI: Patch source faces: 10508
    AMI: Patch target faces: 9877
    AMI: Patch source sum(weights) min:0.99992 max:1.00033 average:1.00004
    AMI: Patch target sum(weights) min:0.999899 max:1.00024 average:1.00004
    AMI: Creating AMI for source:AMI3 and target:AMI3_slave
    AMI: Patch source faces: 3438
    AMI: Patch target faces: 3416
    AMI: Patch source sum(weights) min:0.981432 max:1 average:0.999092
    AMI: Patch target sum(weights) min:0.981187 max:1 average:0.999103
    
    Solving3-D cloud kinematicCloud
    
    Cloud: kinematicCloud injector: model1
    Added 29 new parcels
    
    Cloud: kinematicCloud
    Current number of parcels = 57958
    Current mass in system = 0.0159749
    Linear momentum = (0.000108739 -0.000681819 -0.133831)
    |Linear momentum| = 0.133833
    Linear kinetic energy = 1.59464
    Average particle per parcel = 227453
    Injector model1:
    - parcels added = 59501
    - mass introduced = 0.0163974
    Surface film:
    - parcels absorbed = 0
    - mass absorbed = 0
    - parcels ejected = 0
    Parcel fate: system (number, mass)
    - escape = 1686, 0.000461168
    Parcel fate: patch (walls|rotatewall|wall-blade|inlet-airbig|inlet-airsmall) (number, mass)
    - escape = 0, 0
    - stick = 0, 0
    Parcel fate: patch inlet-par (number, mass)
    - escape = 0, 0
    - stick = 0, 0
    Parcel fate: patch outletcoarse (number, mass)
    - escape = 0, 0
    - stick = 0, 0
    Parcel fate: patch outletfine (number, mass)
    - escape = 1543, 0.000422535
    - stick = 0, 0
    Parcel fate: patch (AMI1|AMI1_slave|AMI2|AMI2_slave|AMI3|AMI3_slave) (number, mass)
    - escape = 0, 0
    - stick = 0, 0
    Min cell volume fraction = 0
    Max cell volume fraction = 0.153386
    Min dense number of parcels = 1
    
    PIMPLE: iteration 1
    smoothSolver: Solving for U.airx, Initial residual = 0.000518979, Final residual = 1.41353e-05, No Iterations 1
    smoothSolver: Solving for U.airy, Initial residual = 0.000566608, Final residual = 1.61927e-05, No Iterations 1
    smoothSolver: Solving for U.airz, Initial residual = 0.000457069, Final residual = 1.44488e-05, No Iterations 1
    GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.165607, Final residual = 0.00108703, No Iterations 2
    GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.011492, Final residual = 0.000100387, No Iterations 4
    GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.00196178, Final residual = 1.24262e-05, No Iterations 5
    time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.99461e-08, global = -3.17012e-10, cumulative = 4.8858e-07
    GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.110414, Final residual = 0.000698195, No Iterations 2
    GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.00769959, Final residual = 5.49637e-05, No Iterations 5
    GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.00131523, Final residual = 7.52728e-08, No Iterations 15
    time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.22513e-08, global = -1.95327e-10, cumulative = 4.88385e-07
    PIMPLE: iteration 2
    smoothSolver: Solving for U.airx, Initial residual = 0.000406817, Final residual = 3.40436e-06, No Iterations 3
    smoothSolver: Solving for U.airy, Initial residual = 0.000448481, Final residual = 4.08898e-06, No Iterations 3
    smoothSolver: Solving for U.airz, Initial residual = 0.000370139, Final residual = 4.3305e-06, No Iterations 3
    GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0605394, Final residual = 0.000293902, No Iterations 3
    GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.00610706, Final residual = 3.71595e-05, No Iterations 4
    GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.000910397, Final residual = 6.90977e-06, No Iterations 4
    time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.28203e-08, global = -2.98262e-10, cumulative = 4.88087e-07
    GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.00789404, Final residual = 6.29906e-05, No Iterations 3
    GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.00173749, Final residual = 1.36789e-05, No Iterations 3
    GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.000208345, Final residual = 7.866e-08, No Iterations 10
    time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.2266e-08, global = -1.9661e-10, cumulative = 4.8789e-07
    smoothSolver: Solving for k.air, Initial residual = 0.00056457, Final residual = 3.34182e-06, No Iterations 3
    ExecutionTime = 2340.61 s ClockTime = 2357 s
    
    Courant Number mean: 0.077187 max: 20.0223
    deltaT = 4.24444e-05
    Time = 0.206549
    
    AMI: Creating AMI for source:AMI1 and target:AMI1_slave
    AMI: Patch source faces: 240
    AMI: Patch target faces: 238
    AMI: Patch source sum(weights) min:0.978606 max:1 average:0.998006
    AMI: Patch target sum(weights) min:0.93414 max:1 average:0.992772
    AMI: Creating AMI for source:AMI2 and target:AMI2_slave
    AMI: Patch source faces: 10508
    AMI: Patch target faces: 9877
    AMI: Patch source sum(weights) min:0.999918 max:1.00033 average:1.00004
    AMI: Patch target sum(weights) min:0.999928 max:1.00024 average:1.00004
    AMI: Creating AMI for source:AMI3 and target:AMI3_slave
    AMI: Patch source faces: 3438
    AMI: Patch target faces: 3416
    AMI: Patch source sum(weights) min:0.981457 max:1 average:0.99909
    AMI: Patch target sum(weights) min:0.981189 max:1 average:0.999102
    
    Solving3-D cloud kinematicCloud
    
    Cloud: kinematicCloud injector: model1
    Added 29 new parcels
    

    bf7c5142-7308-49ea-a9fc-cf53b9ee4fb4-image.png
    e7025d80-6ef5-4e9b-90dd-aeea99ecf160-image.png

    818013f8-5595-4d1b-a619-0121ff736a77-image.png

    1 条回复 最后回复
  • 李东岳李 离线
    李东岳李 离线
    李东岳 管理员
    写于 最后由 编辑
    #2

    颗粒算丢了就会这样,本质是算法的问题,这个不太好处理。尤其还是像你们这种复杂几何、非六面体网格。使用openfoam.org那面的求解器会有改善么?粒子这面ESI那面没有多大的更新。.org那面更新过找颗粒的方法,也更新过AMI(不过也是刚出NCC,估计可能也有bug)

    http://dyfluid.com/index.html
    需要帮助debug算例的看这个 https://cfd-china.com/topic/8018

    余正东余 1 条回复 最后回复
  • 余正东余 离线
    余正东余 离线
    余正东
    在 中回复了 李东岳 最后由 编辑
    #3

    @李东岳 感谢李老师,我准备转向org版本进行研究,采用全新求解器重新实操一下

    1 条回复 最后回复

  • 登录

  • 登录或注册以进行搜索。
  • 第一个帖子
    最后一个帖子
0
  • 最新
  • 版块
  • 东岳流体
  • 随机看[请狂点我]