fluent用LES算水翼边界层选择中心差分引起的震荡如何消除
-
Below is the plot predicted by steadyState solver
simpleFoam
. 10 mins is enough if you have 60/80 cores. You can see that it can be improved. I am not sure if LES can predict better results. Here is the test case, feel free to adjust the settings to see if you can obtain better results. Please also keep me updated. This is an excellent test case to investigate. -
@李东岳 十分感谢李老师!对OPENfoam不太熟,抱歉耽误了这么长时间回复您,现在使用了三种差分格式 1. filteredlinear 过滤系数取0.5 2. filteredlinear 过滤系数取1 3. LUST格式,25%迎风+75%中心
1.
2.
3.速度场wiggle
可以看到中心差分随着过滤强度从0.5-1,耗散性会变大,导致靠近边壁的涡结构被抹平,逐渐向迎风格式的结果过渡,但是都不能解决震荡问题,(过滤掉了一些高频的震荡(碎涡),但是速度场的wiggle依然存在)。LUST格式下没有震荡,虽然只有25%的迎风,但仍然会造成边界层计算不准确,速度梯度不对,结果和二阶迎风类似。目前我认为应该是这个高雷诺数问题(5e5)本身无法用千万量级的网格算边界层,网格雷诺数太高,(我看有人说cell Re <2才能稳定),中心差分耗散太小,导致震荡难以消除。现在准备暂时放弃边界层定量研究了。。。
-
@李东岳 在 fluent用LES算水翼边界层选择中心差分引起的震荡如何消除 中说:
库朗数减小一些,比如0.3或者0.2左右来尝试纯粹的linear。
这个倒是找到一个很有意思的格式("Blends two schemes based on the local face-based Courant number"),
div(phi,U) Gauss CoBlended 0.01 // Co below which scheme1 is used linear // scheme1 0.05 // Co above which scheme2 is used LUST grad(U); // scheme2
这个格式可以根据Co数自动调整格式,可以实现按区域混合各种格式(虽然不是按权重混合)。
-
@xiezhuoyu Nice! 挺有意思
Description 28 Two-scheme Courant number based blending differencing scheme. 29 30 Similar to localBlended but uses a blending factor computed from the 31 face-based Courant number and the lower and upper Courant number limits 32 supplied: 33 \f[ 34 weight = 1 - max(min((Co - Co1)/(Co2 - Co1), 1), 0) 35 \f] 36 where 37 \vartable 38 Co1 | Courant number below which scheme1 is used 39 Co2 | Courant number above which scheme2 is used 40 \endvartable 41 42 The weight applies to the first scheme and 1-weight to the second scheme. 43 44 Example of the CoBlended scheme specification using LUST for Courant numbers 45 less than 1 and linearUpwind for Courant numbers greater than 10: 46 \verbatim 47 divSchemes 48 { 49 . 50 . 51 div(phi,U) Gauss CoBlended 1 LUST grad(U) 10 linearUpwind grad(U); 52 . 53 . 54 } 55 \endverbatim 56 57 SourceFiles 58 CoBlended.C